While LOLbertarians try and extrapolate the NAP into comprehensive moral and political code (which it obviously is not), this is a frankly retarded take on it. Once someone aggresses against you, it's perfectly acceptable to take whatever is necessary and proper to defend your person & property, up to and including utterly destroying them and taking all their shit in compensation (naturally, you have to keep to community standards, it's normally not acceptable to say, kill a kid because he hit a ball onto your lawn).
Clearly, you can do better than this if your intent is to discredit pacifism and restore some sanity to libertarians regarding the use of force.
While LOLbertarians try and extrapolate the NAP into comprehensive moral and political code (which it obviously is not), this is a frankly retarded take on it. Once someone aggresses against you, it's perfectly acceptable to take whatever is necessary and proper to defend your person & property, up to and including utterly destroying them and taking all their shit in compensation (naturally, you have to keep to community standards, it's normally not acceptable to say, kill a kid because he hit a ball onto your lawn).
Clearly, you can do better than this if your intent is to discredit pacifism and restore some sanity to libertarians regarding the use of force.