Multi-Culturalism is Anti-Culturalism. As many people, myself once included in this, move away from civic or legalistic understandings of nationhood and into a more holistic view which understands the need for the trifecta of people, place and culture. One must also do away with the language used to destroy this trifecta.
A culture is the product of a people, who live amongst each other on a land that they have known for millennia. A true culture can only be the product of this relationship, and it can only be understood by those within it. This is why the term multi-culturalism is so damaging, there can be no such thing as a society containing more than one culture, there is only the multi-ethnic jungle which exists to negate culture. This is something the far-left themselves recognise, as should readers too for culture is race, and race is culture. The push for mass immigration isn’t just a Darwinist struggle to eliminate whites biologically, there is a recognition that mixing whites of Western European origin with those of African or Asian descent will also erase the very culture and memory of the Western European nations. See our work on the Becoming a Minority project for more on this and why the term Integration is so poisonous.
And yet, there is a continual push by those of the right and centre to remind us that multi-culturalism is a modern virtue that cannot be questioned, like the equality of all men. Such figures who pedal this myth are either wholly nowhere types who only cling to the cosmopolitan features of late Western Culture, and see their proliferation everywhere as evidence of the efficacy of globalism and pluralism. We all have monstrous glass sky scrapers in our cities, ergo we must be able to live under their shadow all the same. The alternative is that such people, like the far-left, are aimed not so much at pluralism, but multi-culturalism as a method for countering historical and imperial grievances. This alone answers for a considerable portion of the views within the contemporary right, aping the liberal mindset like that described in James Burnhams’ Suicide of The West.
“Of course, even if I share the liberal belief that in objective fact all groups are equal in civilizing potential, it still does not follow that I must accept liberalism's political conclusion. I might continue to want my group to have more than its arithmetic share in running things, simply because it is my group, or because that's the way it's been for a long time and things might get worse if big changes were made; but then I would no longer be reasoning like a liberal, or feeling as a sincere liberal ought to feel.”
At its most genuine Multi-Culturalism leads only to one result the acceleration, and subjection to, third world tastelessness provided by first world excess. It is the worst of both worlds the ever more consumptive capacity of the West given alien rituals and mores to satisfy. No reasonable restraints on the matter, only answering the demands of those incapable of grasping why said restraints where once there. Neither culture left unstained. But who needs culture when you have designer sunglasses, a gold wrapped Bentley, Indo-Thai fusion meals, and a never ending playlist of Afro-Hispanic R’n’B tracks.
It’s funny how they used to mock and ridicule Croydon for decades on the BBC for all the white trash like myself that inhabited it. That mockery stopped, right at the same moment it became a multi culty paradise.